I have yet to meet one person who agrees with me about the enormous benefits of having one world government. I ask them what they have against it, and the only answer I have received so far is "What happens if that government is corrupt" well I answer with this, "OH well, arent all governments corrupt. If a system was designed properly to prevent corruption, you would see less of it in a global government then you see in the hundreds across the world."
Also with this unified earth would come the disapearance of war, the even distribution of resources, and focus on global projects instead of national ones.

Is it not about time that we unify our little blue planet?

Views: 29

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

There will still be war, though. Rival states or sub-states will challenge each other and old grudges may hold. But it's not a half-bad idea. I understand that it will most definitely allow for a better flow of resources and focused efforts.
It's not bad idea with planet government (in Star Wars it was too :) but i think better can be a government for each continets...i donno how u imagine the world government but the continents are smaller and i mean i can be easier to guard and pacific them...
what would you need to guard against if you had a world government?
Heh don't be silly always will be anyone who'll want to more than he have...It'll must be utopy where people have everything what they want.
well, with even distribution of resources, and free sharing of information on a global scale, every1 would have what they wanted. This would be a utopian situation.
It would eventually greatly interweive with technology as everything was slowly transitioned to computer control and people had to work less and less. gotta look at the big picture
Yeah it's look like good picture of future :) But if people will work less and less the start boring...U show me a great idea of utopian future but i mean the menkind still want more and more...
You mean even distribution as in kinda like communism? It wouldn't matter anyway in that sense because we wouldn't have enough supplies for everyone.
America itself can produce enough food to feed everyone in the entire world
The final form of communism is about as far from centralized government control you can get.

The problem with discussions about communism is that both the process of becoming a communist society, and the final goal of that process (a Classless, Stateless society), are called "communism", even though the process in no way resembles the final goal.
I didn't say it, but if people don't work what will they do? I can't imgine i never work and all my life do some sports or computer games or anythig else it must be so boring life without any interesting and risking situatinon...i read abyout this...people hadn't to work and they invite new fun...the was hunt themselves....
Maybe, if you can convince me that a system can be designed so that it can not be corrupted.

Until then: even more power in even fewer hands; bad idea.

Besides, why would we want a one-world government? Which problem does it solve, and how does it solve that problem?
#1 it solves war because there are no longer boundries, territories, or resources to fight over.
#2 it solves all the hunger and medical issues in the world, as the resources would then be evenly distributed and aid would be international.
#3 with the even distribution of resources and redirection of those resources away from national conflicts, we could now put those resources into solving international problems like global warming and the energy crisis

RSS

Latest Activity

Joé replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion A completely random and anonymous person reviews Ipower
6 hours ago
Manjius Mcgayhon posted a discussion

A completely random and anonymous person reviews Ipower

From http://peek.usertesting.comNothing better than an outside look to see one's mistakes.See More
16 hours ago
Joé replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion Narcissism test.
"Yeah, I do agree. A lot of these questions were bad."
yesterday
Vytautas Januškevičius replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion Narcissism test.
"Authority: 6.00   Self-Sufficiency: 1.00   Superiority: 2.00   Exhibitionism: 2.00   Exploitativeness: 2.00   Vanity: 0.00   Entitlement: 2.00 Some of the questions only offered non-logical…"
yesterday
Joé replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion Song Dedication Thread v2.0
"vic & rooky "
yesterday
Manjius Mcgayhon replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion Narcissism test.
"So the only normal person in terms of narcissism in here is Merity. What a reality check this has been."
yesterday
jonas replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion Narcissism test.
"4-5 years ago the total would be me higher right?"
yesterday
jonas replied to KitKat's discussion What is the revolution, and why is the project 2.0
"Its either pleasure or nihilism or both.  "
yesterday
Joé replied to KitKat's discussion What is the revolution, and why is the project 2.0
""What is the revolution?"  Good question. I don't think anyone actually knows the answer.  Also, I don't recall ever saying that "I Power meant that we use our power to help other people". I was maybe…"
Thursday
KitKat posted a discussion

What is the revolution, and why is the project 2.0

I have been coming to this website off and on for a while now, but I don't get why the banner at the top says I am the revolution, and I Power project 2.0.That Joe guy said that I Power meant that we use our power to help other people, but I don't…See More
Thursday
Joé replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion Narcissism test.
" "
Thursday
Joé replied to Manjius Mcgayhon's discussion Narcissism test.
" "
Thursday

© 2014   Created by Reese Leysen.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service