The environment is changing, and no matter whose fault it is, I don`t think it will look like in that movie "The Day After Tomorrow", but there will be more storms; some areas will loose water, and some will gain. Thanks to research on how the climate is changing we can get some predictions of what to expect; And I hope we will use this opportunity. 

I want some discussion about preparing for this, because i think climate change is inevitable. Last Christmas there was a storm in the western part of this country. Power grids went down; roads were blocked; ambulance`s could not reach people. This kind of storm is one of the things we will have to expect to see more often.

That`s just small local issues compared to the problems that will develop globally. Large populations will be emigrating from arid areas; crops can be destroyed by storms; cockroaches and other unwanted will move further north. I will write some questions here about the global issues, and it would be nice if some of you have some answers. :)

Some global issues:


Immigration

When a large area becomes arid, flooded or in any way uninhabitable, there will be refugees. They won`t necessarily have the opportunity to stay within their own country. How shall these be treated? Can it be justified to not help them? 

Multi-national water supplies

The Nile river in north-east africa is a good example of this. Ethiopia has been building dams and irrigation systems. This takes water from a source that is used by several other countries. Egypt who is in the other end of the Nile is not very happy about this. But then again, 90 % of the water in the Nile comes from Ethiopia.  The Aral sea is a story of how much damage bad handling of a water-resource can cause.

Hunger

When unexpected famines occurs, should it be a responsibility of the world to help? Or should it still be done as charity? The first implies that those who are capable should aid without question. The second implies that there has to be some certain circumstances for you to help.

And what circumstances do you think would be necessary?

Tags: Environment

Views: 286

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

One fact that I've learned over the years that is both scary, and yet somewhat comforting at the same time, is that life is about change -- Nothing ever stays the same. So whenever I see an article written by some environmentalist who is passionately trying to tell us all that we should be concerned about some endangered species of animal going extinct, or about the dangers of climate change, etc., I personally don't tend to get very alarmed or upset.  Maybe my attitude is partially related to a type of cultural bias, in that I have never personally had to deal with any extreme changes in my own environment; or maybe it's because of how I look at human beings in general..  Because regardless of how often I talk badly about humanity, in the sense of how stupid I think people are, etc., the fact remains that we are probably the most adaptable species of animal on this planet! and we can live almost anywhere!  Why?  Because if we find a certain environment hostile or unsuitable to us and we don't like it, we fucking change it!  lol 

Again, that could be a good thing, or a bad thing, depending upon how you look at it.  :-)

However, on the flip-side of that, I also think that there is a very good chance that we are going to do something stupid, {like start a nuclear holocaust or create a deadly new virus that we can't control,} and that we will bring about our own extinction as a species.  As comedian George Carlin pointed out so eloquently once, though, the planet won't give a fuck if we do; and there are even some species here that might flourish in the hostile environment that we created after we are gone.  :-)

The one thing that I am concerned about regards the subject of your last series of ethical questions, and that is our responsibility to each other on a global scale; because I've also become fairly convinced that we will not survive the next 50 years as a species if we continue in our current nationalistic and competitive belief systems. So my answer to your question(s) is that, Yes, it is our {"the world's"} responsibility to help each other when bad things happen somewhere; and Yes, we should be concerned for each other on a global scale, and not just because the people who are in distress happen to live in close proximity to us, or because of some nationalistic, patriotic devotion. And, since I feel it is a responsibility, or duty, you are right in that it could not technically be called charity; because charity is something that we do out of kindness and compassion; not out of obligation.  ;-) 

Just for fun, see also: 

8 Species That Are Threatening to Swarm the Globe

Stephen Petranek counts down to Armageddon

Martin Rees asks: Is this our final century?

RSS

Latest Activity

Noah Keaton liked Lawrence Carson's photo
8 hours ago
Greg posted a blog post

College

I am approximately 2 months away from graduation at a college…See More
13 hours ago
Anthony D replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"An interesting thing to look into is the "Fundamental attribution Error".  It explains what you experience. The fundamental attribution error has to do with what we think causes behavior or outcomes. When we look at ourselves and…"
20 hours ago
Lore's discussion was featured

Condemning others to validate ourselves.

I'd like to discuss something that bothers me about people, how often times people condemn others for doing something wrong all the while ignoring their own transgressions. I'm going to use an extreme example of school shooters. Society condemns…See More
yesterday
Lore posted a discussion

Condemning others to validate ourselves.

I'd like to discuss something that bothers me about people, how often times people condemn others for doing something wrong all the while ignoring their own transgressions. I'm going to use an extreme example of school shooters. Society condemns…See More
yesterday
Aya replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation"
"Yes, so the point that the two of you are making is valid IF a fetus, blastula, morula, fertilized egg, etc. are considered to have life rights. The entire point of this thought experiment is to determine if we should give these entities life rights…"
yesterday
TanyaVilleneuve is now a member of I Power
yesterday
Tyler Jackson replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation"
"I guess I should clarify that there are circumstances where I believe abortion is warranted. Rape situations are a prime example of a scenario where I believe abortion is an ethical means to prevent unneeded suffering to the woman, who has already…"
yesterday
Dave replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation"
"I think the idea that Tyler is trying to import about 'Abortion satisfy(ing) the needs of the few...', is not utilitarian in nature, but rather a statement about what could be seen as the selfish wishes of the feminine party.  The…"
Thursday
Aya replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation"
"Thanks for your reply Tyler. Some of the following is tangential, but it is somewhat related and of note so whatever. 1) "I believe it is unethical to abort fetuses because we don't know if it is unethical": I do not think this is an…"
Thursday
Nathaniel Mortazavi liked Lore's blog post You can call me Mr. Morality.
Thursday
Anthony D replied to Anthony D's discussion Lexical argumentation and its merit
"A fair point, that formal logic in and of itself is flawed and one could argue in no lesser degree then lexical argumentation. as an added note, if you want to look into alternatives to Aristotelian logic, a good piece of theory to look…"
Thursday

© 2013   Created by Reese Leysen.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service