I Power
Scientific Research & Self-Development Activism
Casual Sex
This is one thing most people do these days. Sex with people without being in a romantic relationship. One night stands, booty calls, fuck buddies, and other things that represent emotionless physical sexual encounters with people that are under the category of casual sex Socially this is glorified and try to justify casual sex so they can "Be better" within a real relationship in the future. Even though to me, I believe sex is meant for people with long term relationships, what is your view on casual sex? Do you do it yourself perhaps? Any good justifications for performing these actions?
Tags: casual, relationship, sex
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by sXe SeekerScorpio on -
@Kaioshin
And you talk out your ass ALL THE TIME. Vent, chat, and threads. You never attempt to backup ANYTHING you say just spew out opinions. Most the things I say, I CAN back up! Also, I wrote this thread so I can see if someone can truly back up casual sex and if their is any good reasons, because from what I researched it's more cons then pros.
You done talking out your ass yet, because your prepubescent style of talking and lack of thinking (see sluts in school 2nd post) is very annoying. -
-
Permalink Reply by sXe SeekerScorpio on
-
I actually can prove you're just a troll and all you do is instigate and cause problems. I can go through pretty much ANY of your posts and verify what I say is accurate. You're just another J-Boel to me and I don't mind being a crusader once again and regulate you trolls.
Face it child, Vic will not show you some T&A(that's the only reason your here and many of the old "non Ipower rangers" vent people can prove that) so why the hell are you constantly here setting yourself up for failure against me? All you ever did and will ever do is talk out your ass unless you finally grow up. -
-
Permalink Reply by z-man on -
The meaning of sex has different meanings for different people.
It is pretty complicated stuff, so there is no easy answer.
But one thing I can guarantee you. That if you follow the path of only having sex with someone you are married too or really love, you will either have no girlfriend at all or your girlfriend will leave you for someone that does not think like this. I am not telling to go around and have sex with anyone. Be selective but do not restrain you so much that you kill all sexual tension in your relationship because you want to save it for the one. -
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Pinder on -
Personally, casual sex is fine for pleasure but when there's no connectivity on other levels (socially, spiritually) it just seems to me pretty primitive. Then again that's fine but I'd prefer to find someone I adore on all levels before wanting to have sex, other than that its just testosterone telling you what to do. People are different, so do what you wanna do but within reason.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Daniel Cherry on -
Hey casual sex might be better than none right??
-
-
Permalink Reply by z-man on
-
No sex always end in people getting very frustrated and getting increased unrealistic expectancies of future potential partners. Most potential partners will actually walk with a big arc around these people since they are emitting a desperate need of having sex, even when they pretend not to need it.
If you are a single adult and have not had sex for a very long time, I can only advice you to set aside your principles and go for a one night stand if you get a choice so your feet touch back the ground and your expectations become realistic. Of course be very selective and do make sure that you are protected. -
-
Permalink Reply by sXe SeekerScorpio on
-
Haha. You want to know my expectations? A girl who doesn't drink or do drugs... and doesn't have borderline health problems brought upon themselves.... That is shooting very high in THESE days. I mean the first 2 =P
-
-
Permalink Reply by z-man on
-
Women doing drugs is also somethig I avoid.
Also a girl that has a hobby to do one night stands, swinging and sex parties. Not because she does that but of the increased risk of getting a STD, and the passion in the sex gets so routine that I am just one in the 100 others she has. Nice for her hobby but she has 99 others she can have sex with, I do not need her and she does not need me.
The big difference here is that I do not condemn her acting, just I choose not to go with her interest. -
-
Permalink Reply by sXe SeekerScorpio on
-
Yeah I forgot to throw in that "hobby" as part of the expectations. I mean even with that added, my expectations are not that high.
-
Forum
Condemning others to validate ourselves.
Started by Lore in I Power: Self-Development Activism. Last reply by Anthony D 20 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation"
Started by Aya in Off-Topic. Last reply by Aya yesterday. 33 Replies 1 Like
Lexical argumentation and its merit
Started by Anthony D in Off-Topic. Last reply by Anthony D on Thursday. 21 Replies 0 Likes
Latest Activity
Anthony D replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves."An interesting thing to look into is the "Fundamental attribution Error". It explains what you experience.
The fundamental attribution error has to do with what we think causes behavior or outcomes. When we look at ourselves and…"
Lore's discussion was featuredCondemning others to validate ourselves.
I'd like to discuss something that bothers me about people, how often times people condemn others for doing something wrong all the while ignoring their own transgressions. I'm going to use an extreme example of school shooters. Society condemns…See More
Lore posted a discussionCondemning others to validate ourselves.
I'd like to discuss something that bothers me about people, how often times people condemn others for doing something wrong all the while ignoring their own transgressions. I'm going to use an extreme example of school shooters. Society condemns…See More
Aya replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation""Yes, so the point that the two of you are making is valid IF a fetus, blastula, morula, fertilized egg, etc. are considered to have life rights.
The entire point of this thought experiment is to determine if we should give these entities life rights…"
Tyler Jackson replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation""I guess I should clarify that there are circumstances where I believe abortion is warranted.
Rape situations are a prime example of a scenario where I believe abortion is an ethical means to prevent unneeded suffering to the woman, who has already…"
Dave replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation""I think the idea that Tyler is trying to import about 'Abortion satisfy(ing) the needs of the few...', is not utilitarian in nature, but rather a statement about what could be seen as the selfish wishes of the feminine party. The…"
Aya replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation""Thanks for your reply Tyler. Some of the following is tangential, but it is somewhat related and of note so whatever.
1) "I believe it is unethical to abort fetuses because we don't know if it is unethical": I do not think this is an…"
Anthony D replied to Anthony D's discussion Lexical argumentation and its merit"A fair point, that formal logic in and of itself is flawed and one could argue in no lesser degree then lexical argumentation.
as an added note, if you want to look into alternatives to Aristotelian logic, a good piece of theory to look…"
© 2013 Created by Reese Leysen.
