Scientific Research & Self-Development Activism
Most of us have had climate change pounded into us, through school, with images of a planet in a greehouse, through the entire media So why is it that ice caps are now growing, as reported by the Australian News? The London Telegraph reports that the world's top sea level expert denounces claims of rising sea levels, dismissing them as innacurate computer models. Paul Joseph Watson, reports, citing mainstream sources, that arctic ice has grown 30% in a year and that UN scientists have, again, been caught lying about climate statistics. to support their policies.
The London's Guardian Newspaper, explains what is happening. They report that a "Cooling Sun brings relief to sweltering Earth", explaining that climate change is caused by the sun, and its long term, and 11yr sunspot cycle. The sun's recent reduction in activity explains ice cap growth. This follows a period when, as reported by the BBC, sunspot activity was at its highest for over 1000yrs.
Painting of the last Frost Fair on London's Thames, of 1814, at the end of "The Little Ice Age" (The Thames hasn't frozen sufficiently to walk on since that date).
In the BBC article above, the BBC admit that the little ice age, between 1645 and 1715 was associated with a period of very low sunspot activity, refered to as the Maunder Minimum. During this period, the River Thames in London froze over to allow the wonderful frost fairs, that were written about by Jane Austen. That cold period preceeded a very warm period during the middle ages, when vines and olives were grown in Britain. We are no where near those high temperatures today, and the warming appears to have reversed, as it always does, in natural cycles.
For those who don't like being decieved, note the London Telegraph's report, that Polar Bears thrived during the recent warming period. Contrary to what your primary school teacher may have told you, Polar Bears are the greatest swimmers of all land mammals. They like to sail ice flows and routinely swim hundreds of miles, hunting Beluga Wales in arctic water. Increased sea ice is infact more likely to close off sea hunting grounds, and cause migrations and a reduction in polar bear populations. Not only that, but, in a rediculous game of doublethink and deception, our leaders now claim that we must destroy the environment to save it.
"We've got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy." - Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation
With these mainstream articles in mind, it is important to re-consider what we have been asked to do, to "save the planet". You may have been pummelled with childrens TV shows, where Superman, Spiderman, etc, etc, ad nauseum, save the planet, but have we been conditioned to be unrealistic about threats? Were we inundated by stories of superhero's in childhood, and more believable hero's in adulthood movies, to condition us to jump when told to do so, with the excuse of saving the planet? Are we captive of conditioned arrogance in a program of mass mind control?
Re-consider, that we have been asked to reduce our populations, stop driving, pro-creating, and, in the midst of a depression, pay crucifying carbon taxes to the very central banks that caused the economic crisis. Take note, that the taxing and regulation of carbon, means that governments everywhere can tax and regulate every single activity, because we are carbon based life forms. This is of course the dream of countless despots. And note, that the only way of dealing with these issues, is world government, also dreamed of by the nastiest of despots, from Alexander the Great to Hitler. So we have a duty to our children to question every word said by those pushing this agenda.
There is also an alternative. It is called freedom. For more on the free market approach to the environment, and we don't currently have free markets, check out this audio chapter of A New Liberty, by Murray N. Rothbard.
"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony... climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world." - Christine Stewart, fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment
Here is a great 10min podcast on climate change that is convenient to share and provides, towards the end, a refreshing solution to the crisis:
This is a great clip from Congress on the implications of government forcing us to use mercury filled CFL lightbulbs. Just goes to show the falacy of the central planning of lightbulbs! So there goes the joke, how many governments does it take to screw in a murcury filled lightbulb? Two, China to provide cover up the dirty industrial practices required to make it profitable and the Federal Government to create the propaganda to sell it to the public.
If you enjoyed the first podcast, have a listen to this, from the Mises Institute. Here is a text article if you prefer to read.
In questioning the globlal warming scare, Al Gore must be exposed as the charlitan that he is. He owns an oil company for goodness sakes and is worth over $100million. He is Getting Rich Spreading Global Warming Hysteria and, you guessed it, he has financial links with Goldman Sach's who just stole over 12.8 trillion from US taxpayers, as reported by Bloomberg. It is they who would manage any futures market in carbon. That bailout is now larger in cost than all America's wars, ever, and some big government programs combined.
For those who don't know it yet, there is no altruism in top level politics. If anybody thought Obama was "Change you can believe in" A combination of interesting mainstream and alternative media reports reveal compelling links between president Obama and a privately owned carbon trading group, which also has direct ties with elitist groups such as the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission
First, lets rejoice that our progeny can inherit the earth. Next, lets dump the propaganda based precautionary principle in favor of scientific rigor, along with over 31,000 Scientists who have, as stated by London Telegraph, denounced claims that man is responsible for climate change. We can then focus in on real environmental issues, which are mainly caused by corporate monopolies that wonly exist because of fractional reserve banking, central banks, and big government. We must end the precautionary principle, returning to the old paradigm, whereby we constantly evaluate new data, and learn to weed out agenda based propaganda from scientific truth. The precautionary principle, in contrast, is the rediculous notion that we should act based on fear and probability. When those actions mean the userping of natural rights and liberty, we must become circumspect in our judgements, taking time to pause and think, whenever immediate action is demanded of us by those altruistic politicians.
Then remains the challenge of regaining our liberties, to counter the big brother surveillance state built up under the guise of carbon regulation, and to resist the debilitating effect of carbon regulation, tax and rationing, which is simply neo-feudalism, where we are tricked into giving most of our wealth to government. We must also resist the programming of our children on TV and at school and university, where they are tought that they are useless eaters who are destroying the earth. Hands up who has been convinced that they should avoid the joys of having children to save the earth, whilst government re-populates the country with foreigners to help us pay off the national debt? There realy is no pleasing these people. Remember that this education is indoctrinating us to accept stated United Nations Policy:
A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.
- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
But sustainable for whom? Could it be that we are simply more manageable by corporate monopolies at 1 to 3 billion? Could it be, that the corporatist fascist model of today, and invisaged, is not capable of supporting such a high population? As we can see with the current economic collapse.
But we are not given the alternative of liberty. With liberty and freedom, the world could sustain 10x more population than we have today. Read about at Campaignforliberty and LewRockwell.com . Discover What You Should Know About Inflation, to discover the real reason why the economy doesn't provide for us. Just for example, look at Henry Ford's hemp car, 5x stronger than steel, didn't dent, didn't rust, but was never put into production, why? Because corporate monopolies don't want us to be wealthy and secure. They are at this point holding us back, supported by the state, that combination is Mussolini's model of economic fascism, and it can lead to the military form, so we should be countering it at every level. There are so many examples of repressed technolgy and natural technology, etc, that the mind boggles at where we would be today without state sponsored and bailed out corporate monopolies.
For a further example, Britain, with 60m people in a country the size of Florida, is self-sufficient in milk. Yet farmers are poor, why? Because milk is pasteurized, by law, forcing it into connected third party distributers who commoditize a complex product, allowing them to cream off the profit, whilst we pay more for a terrible substitute. Read about raw milk, and realize that legalized, it would cure most chronic deseases, it being the most perfect food, until pasteurized. raw-milk-facts.com
And finally, take one last look at the United Nations. They, as global government, have an interest in it, which is expressed in this quote, from United Nation's "Club of Rome" think tank's document, The First Global Revolution,:, Al Gore is a member.
p75 "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself."
And London's Financial Times ran an Editorial stating "And Now for World Government". The artical admits that it would be dictatorial and has been developed in secret.
It is now time to take a stand, to differentiate between real issues, dumping the hobgoblins put before us to unite us behind a tyranical New World Order.
We must, in the face of a non-problem, have the strength to do NOTHING, to say NO.
Replies are closed for this discussion.