So Chiren wanted us to give him questions for the new video hes working on i say we put them here. Please stick to asking specific questions in here and refrain from flaming and bashing.

Views: 636

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

1. You said C is Conciousness as a quanta and reference frame. What I have a problem with is the "Time" or Consecutive moments that lead up to the creation of conciousness.Is there a Universe without councious beiings to observe it. If yes how did these beiings come to be? If not what defines C and the resulting interactions in the reference frame without a consciousness ? Is it other quanta of the universe?

2. How does the theory resolve the conflict of on one hand declaring the big bang as a misconception and on the other hand the existance of cosmic background radiation? Is the big bang still part of the expression of the universe as the first "Moments" of consecutive timeless moments and therefore able to create the radiation but not the beginning of the universe itself as the beginning of the "simulation using the quantum programming code"?

Chiren - Can you please show us the C=hf formula with numbers?

You said that everything around is just a probability - WHAT determines this probability? For example - WHY is the probability of an apple's appearance MORE likely to look like an apple, than a banana?

will chiren (&reese) actually discuss with the community here or will there (only) be vlogs and livestreams?
I'd just like to see "the math" behind all this. Just trow somewhere paper of data please, I'd like to see THAT before I can say anything filled with criticism.
Do you know ervin laszlo and his writtings?

Thank you for the thread.

I limited myself to a mystical number of questions.

1. Assuming time and space are opposite vectors, and only the now exists. How can be described the simultaneity or non-simultaneity of two distinct events? For example, two photons hitting one another or not?

2. How can we explain that we can see the results of a past event in the present is there is only a timeless now?

3. How do you solve the problem of mechanics equations being time-symmetric and thermodynamics not being so?

4. According to your theory, the fact that two objects appear to be close would only be due to the resonance between them. But interference/resonance do not appear in macroscopic objects. So how do they happen to resonate?

5. Since the reference frame is amplified, and the vectors are accelerated exponentially, I understand the energy of every particle in the universe should be growing exponentially. Surely a satellite is accelerated exponentially but the form of the acceleration then is e^ix (which means it's centripetal), not e^x, which does not leaves the absolute value of the vectors unchanged. Your video shows growing vectors. And if the form is e^ix, which is the center around which every particle revolves?

9. If the arrow of time is opposite to the arrow of distance and this is the reason why we perceive an expanding universe, then if I wait 10 seconds then shouldn't my computer be 10 light seconds away from me?

7. How would we look "forward" in time? In the docu, you say we have to look forward in order to see the origin of the universe, I assume it's forward in time according to the livestream where Chiren expressedly opposed it to the traditional trick in physics of looking backward in time. Since you say this becasue space and time are opposite, this means you're looking backward in space, to where space become zero, so you're assuming the big bang in a way. Or I didn't understand. In traditional physics, we're looking forward in space to see backward in time because light travels at a limited speed. What role does play the time of travel of light in your theory?

8. How does this solve the horizon problem? I understand that you say the universe just "seems" to be expanding, but do you actually mean it's not?

6. Can you explain why all this solves the problem of probability wave collapse?

10. Assuming your theory is true, how do you manage to make predictions about, say, particle interactions, total energy of the universe and percentage of dark energy, life expectancy of black holes?

11; The idea that time, space, mass, energy are properties of quanta and not the other way round is very interesting, but the wave-particle duality which your theory is built upon suppose the existence of theses. How do you solve this paradox?

12. "The fact that our consciousness itself seems to be made out of quantized particles" (27:11) If I understand your theory, we would see things in the universe a certain way only because our consciousness is creating a certain arrow of time, which is a very seducing idea, but then why would we all have the same arrow of time? If time is opposite to space, why aren't there infinite directions in time, and why aren't we always changing directions in time?

@Nympheanity very interesting Questions, im interested in them as well now that you mention them however i have also another question to add:

How does the Theory pertain to findings concerning Dark Matter. As it is currently known either to be a mathematical artifact created by a wrong theory of gravity at cosmologic scales or composed of matter we currently do not understand. What i'd like to know is if your theory can explain the expansion of the universe, can it correctly simulate the macrocosmic interactions of clusters and galaxies without invoking a concept of dark matter, or even explain the composition of dark matter if it exists?
Chiren's thinking of doing regular livestreams about this stuff and will try to answer all questions posted here!

There is a demonstrable and experimentally demonstrated equivalence between energy and information. i.e. s = hf.

Why is it that you never mention information?

Chiren jusr some very stupid quesitons, yet kinda important for me..

 

1: what is your background in the scientific field, and especially math.

2: have you writen a scientific thesis on this?

3: Are you willing to let this theory go through a peer review proces in the cientific field?

 

This sounds much more near to Philosophy than science tbh, and these to branches are not far appart, i know that. I just think your point with this would get out much more clear without all the math in it.

 

WIth that said, well done :-) its a really tough topic you managed to compress into one little equation!! 

I Got really easy question, Where to really start learning something about quata and the things you talking. cuz i understand only about 25% from the Documentary. i can't really understand everything if i got no base/ground under, the first main things about quanta physics and so on...

Why do you only define consciousness as being in the now? Lucid dreams, observing memories, imagination, etc, are all realms independent of the now where consciousness may occur.

RSS

Latest Activity

Aya replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"Empathy and understanding of a person's mindset and actions, while noble pursuits, do not provide an ability in relegating responsibility of such mindsets and actions to a certain party. Placing of blame and responsibility requires a…"
3 hours ago
Nathaniel Mortazavi replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"Cognitive dissonance. One of the most irritating human traits."
21 hours ago
Nathaniel Mortazavi replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"Absolutely, I completely agree. The only way to solve the problem is to eliminate the cause. Exactly, the shooter gains worldwide fame over night. Why would a resentful, friendless, lonely, insane young man who wanted to leave an impression on the…"
21 hours ago
Noah Keaton liked Greg's blog post College
23 hours ago
Aya replied to Aya's discussion The ethical implications of "Temporal Isolation"
"From the last three lines of your post, I'm assuming you are applying the "better safe than sorry" mentality to life-rights over all of time. This addresses points 3) and 5) of my post on Wed 5/15, but does not address points 1),…"
yesterday
Isaac Renshaw joined The Shiznit's group
Thumbnail

Creating Your Own "Crew"

This is a Group for people who are interested in the idea of expanding I-Power by encouraging our members to create I-Power/SDA related cell groups, or "Crews" in their own communities.See More
yesterday
Isaac Renshaw joined The Shiznit's group
Thumbnail

The Transition Movement

The Transition Movement is a grassroots Network of communities that are working to build resilience in response to peak oil, climate change, and economic instability.  Utilizing various concepts such as Permaculture and Local Currency systems, the…See More
yesterday
Profile IconMathias Larsen and John Phares joined I Power
Monday
Anthony D replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"An issue in the context of your reply is the so-called "mad/bad debate". And it very much plays into the perception of these rather extreme forms of criminal behavior. From a legal and forensic psychological standpoint a…"
Monday
Lore replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"Interesting. I think that just being aware that our behavior is not always justified and taking on some personal responsibility can go a long way."
Monday
Lore replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"Maybe I take empathy and attempting to understand such actions by people to the extreme, but I think it is important to understand the causes of such behavior. You do bring up a good point about school shootings Nathaniel, in that the media makes…"
Monday
Nathaniel Mortazavi replied to Lore's discussion Condemning others to validate ourselves.
"I agree with the principle to an extent. However, in the case of school shooters, I don't think it can be justified. Same with rape. There's definitely a line, but like you said, those are the most extreme cases. On the topic of mass…"
Sunday

© 2013   Created by Reese Leysen.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service