Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Curd Zöchmann on January 26, 2011 at 11:23pm

1. You said C is Conciousness as a quanta and reference frame. What I have a problem with is the "Time" or Consecutive moments that lead up to the creation of conciousness.Is there a Universe without councious beiings to observe it. If yes how did these beiings come to be? If not what defines C and the resulting interactions in the reference frame without a consciousness ? Is it other quanta of the universe?

2. How does the theory resolve the conflict of on one hand declaring the big bang as a misconception and on the other hand the existance of cosmic background radiation? Is the big bang still part of the expression of the universe as the first "Moments" of consecutive timeless moments and therefore able to create the radiation but not the beginning of the universe itself as the beginning of the "simulation using the quantum programming code"?

Permalink Reply by D to the A on January 26, 2011 at 11:28pm

Chiren - Can you please show us the C=hf formula with numbers?

You said that everything around is just a probability - WHAT determines this probability? For example - WHY is the probability of an apple's appearance MORE likely to look like an apple, than a banana?

Permalink Reply by DAN on January 26, 2011 at 11:58pm

will chiren (&reese) actually discuss with the community here or will there (only) be vlogs and livestreams?

Permalink Reply by Martin Zahálka on January 27, 2011 at 1:36am

I'd just like to see "the math" behind all this. Just trow somewhere paper of data please, I'd like to see THAT before I can say anything filled with criticism.

Permalink Reply by DAN on January 27, 2011 at 1:51am

Do you know ervin laszlo and his writtings?

Permalink Reply by Nympheanity on January 27, 2011 at 2:35am

Thank you for the thread.

I limited myself to a mystical number of questions.

1. Assuming time and space are opposite vectors, and only the now exists. How can be described the simultaneity or non-simultaneity of two distinct events? For example, two photons hitting one another or not?

2. How can we explain that we can see the results of a past event in the present is there is only a timeless now?

3. How do you solve the problem of mechanics equations being time-symmetric and thermodynamics not being so?

4. According to your theory, the fact that two objects appear to be close would only be due to the resonance between them. But interference/resonance do not appear in macroscopic objects. So how do they happen to resonate?

5. Since the reference frame is amplified, and the vectors are accelerated exponentially, I understand the energy of every particle in the universe should be growing exponentially. Surely a satellite is accelerated exponentially but the form of the acceleration then is e^ix (which means it's centripetal), not e^x, which does not leaves the absolute value of the vectors unchanged. Your video shows growing vectors. And if the form is e^ix, which is the center around which every particle revolves?

9. If the arrow of time is opposite to the arrow of distance and this is the reason why we perceive an expanding universe, then if I wait 10 seconds then shouldn't my computer be 10 light seconds away from me?

7. How would we look "forward" in time? In the docu, you say we have to look forward in order to see the origin of the universe, I assume it's forward in time according to the livestream where Chiren expressedly opposed it to the traditional trick in physics of looking backward in time. Since you say this becasue space and time are opposite, this means you're looking backward in space, to where space become zero, so you're assuming the big bang in a way. Or I didn't understand. In traditional physics, we're looking forward in space to see backward in time because light travels at a limited speed. What role does play the time of travel of light in your theory?

8. How does this solve the horizon problem? I understand that you say the universe just "seems" to be expanding, but do you actually mean it's not?

6. Can you explain why all this solves the problem of probability wave collapse?

10. Assuming your theory is true, how do you manage to make predictions about, say, particle interactions, total energy of the universe and percentage of dark energy, life expectancy of black holes?

11; The idea that time, space, mass, energy are properties of quanta and not the other way round is very interesting, but the wave-particle duality which your theory is built upon suppose the existence of theses. How do you solve this paradox?

12. "The fact that our consciousness itself seems to be made out of quantized particles" (27:11) If I understand your theory, we would see things in the universe a certain way only because our consciousness is creating a certain arrow of time, which is a very seducing idea, but then why would we all have the same arrow of time? If time is opposite to space, why aren't there infinite directions in time, and why aren't we always changing directions in time?

Permalink Reply by Curd Zöchmann on January 27, 2011 at 5:09am

@Nympheanity very interesting Questions, im interested in them as well now that you mention them however i have also another question to add:

How does the Theory pertain to findings concerning Dark Matter. As it is currently known either to be a mathematical artifact created by a wrong theory of gravity at cosmologic scales or composed of matter we currently do not understand. What i'd like to know is if your theory can explain the expansion of the universe, can it correctly simulate the macrocosmic interactions of clusters and galaxies without invoking a concept of dark matter, or even explain the composition of dark matter if it exists?

Permalink Reply by Reese Leysen on January 27, 2011 at 5:45pm

Chiren's thinking of doing regular livestreams about this stuff and will try to answer all questions posted here!

Permalink Reply by Jhenifer Heloizy on January 27, 2011 at 8:40pm

There is a demonstrable and experimentally demonstrated equivalence between energy and information. i.e. s = hf.

Why is it that you never mention information?

Permalink Reply by Wurp on January 27, 2011 at 9:19pm

Chiren jusr some very stupid quesitons, yet kinda important for me..

 

1: what is your background in the scientific field, and especially math.

2: have you writen a scientific thesis on this?

3: Are you willing to let this theory go through a peer review proces in the cientific field?

 

This sounds much more near to Philosophy than science tbh, and these to branches are not far appart, i know that. I just think your point with this would get out much more clear without all the math in it.

 

WIth that said, well done :-) its a really tough topic you managed to compress into one little equation!! 

Permalink Reply by Tomass on January 27, 2011 at 9:57pm

I Got really easy question, Where to really start learning something about quata and the things you talking. cuz i understand only about 25% from the Documentary. i can't really understand everything if i got no base/ground under, the first main things about quanta physics and so on...

Permalink Reply by Ryan on January 27, 2011 at 10:22pm

Why do you only define consciousness as being in the now? Lucid dreams, observing memories, imagination, etc, are all realms independent of the now where consciousness may occur.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page